|
|
| India is one of the wettest countries in the world; its average rainfall is 1170mm. Yet today, with our population touching 1000 crore, we face acute water shortage along the length and breadth of the country.
India at present uses only a tenth of the rainfall it receives annually. Our rainfall is highly seasonal. About 80% of the country receives 80% of its rainfall as liquid rain in a three month period. The principle of rain water harvesting is to conserve rain water where it falls according to local needs and geophysical conditions.
Inspiration has been working for over a decade in the field of decentralized waster management at the community level, especially along coastal south India. One of our pioneering works has been the planning and execution of Total Water Management for BTH Sarovaram in Cochin, Kerala.
In this report, we present details of the systems installed in BTH Sarovaram.
BTH Bharat Hotel, a popular hotel in Ernakulam, Kerala, established in 1964, and renowned for its vegetarian cuisine, efficient service and cleanliness -- together with its sister concern M/s BGR Hotels Pvt. Ltd., has embarked on its new Hotel and Convention Centre project at Kannadikadavu, 6 km south of Ernakulam, along the NH 47 byepass. The project, named BTH Sarovaram, includes |
| • |
two Restaurants with total 125 seats, |
| • |
a Business centre, |
| • |
a central Kitchen Block which also serves to the other restaurants of BTH in Ernakulam, |
| • |
14 Cottages, |
| • |
a Convention Centre to seat 500 people with Banquet facilities, |
| • |
an Ayurveda Health Centre, |
| • |
a Hotel Management Training Institute with dormitory accommodation facility for 40 persons |
| • |
and all related infrastructure including a Boat jetty and a lawn for get-togethers, spaces for exhibitions and displays and other amusement facilities. |
|
The hotel has been functional since October 1999. |
The Site
The Hotel is located in a plot of extent of approx. 5 acres, along the Ernakulam- Alleppey bypass road.
The plot, which was originally paddy fields has the top 1 ms with filled up soil, below which is a 2ms layer of silty clay. Further below it is predominantly organic clay till the rock layer, which is prevalent at almost 60 ms below ground level.
The western boundary of the site is a stretch of backwaters. The present level of the site is almost same as the maximum High Tide Level (HTL), which is +108 cms above Mean Sea Level (MSL). The recorded maximum High Flood Level (MFL) near the site is +137 cms above MSL. |
Sources for water supply
From the initial planning stage, it was thus obvious that one of the main constraints in the site was lack of availability of potable water.
Though almost surrounded by water, Cochin is a place, which faces acute water shortage because of its peculiar geophysical characteristics. The network of back waters (for which Kerala is best known) act as links between the rivers and the sea. These large water bodies have fresh water during the monsoon (till about December). However, during the dry months the seawater flows inward to the backwaters making them brackish. Surface wells in the region also yield only brackish water during the dry months. There are no rock formations along the coastal belt at reasonable depths and hence possibility of drilling bore wells for sourcing fresh water was also to be ruled out.
Piped water supply from Kerala Water Authority amounts to only about 1000 litres per day. There is acute scarcity of municipal water supply in Cochin and hence prospect of increased supply from the Water Authority is highly improbable.
The only other source is water supplied by private tanker lorries; but this, besides being extremely expensive, is also untreated water with uncertain quality.
After considering the various options, ‘Inspiration' recommended that the best option would be to have a Total Water Management Plan for the Project – the basic concept of which was focused on |
| • |
A reservoir with an impermeable lining to collect and store the bountiful rainwater for the dry months. |
| • |
The plot is not connected to the city sewerage line and hence the need for a properly designed on the site treatment of sewage and waste water to prevent contamination of ground water in the few surface wells on the site. |
| • |
Recycling of treated wastewater for non potable end uses such as flushing, gardening etc |
|
| Such a planning would not only work economical on the long run, but also ensure supply of safe, uncontaminated water throughout the year. The next step was to work out the fundamentals of rainwater harvesting and purification and decentralized wastewater treatment systems.
The ideas unfolded logically. The scale of the project was worked out based on the projected average water requirements. Based on Indian standards, the basic water requirement for the project worked out as follows. One of the basic policy decisions was to opt for a dual line system – in other words, separating the potable and non-potable end uses. |
Water Requirements
The water requirement for the Hotel is as follows
| Average per day requirement |
Potable |
26000 lt |
| |
Non-potable |
18500 lt |
|
Design of the rain water harvesting system
Kochi has an average annual rainfall of 3000 millimetres. The project was planned for a capacity to address 120 totally dry days. The average annual evaporation loss in Kochi is 1800 millimetres. Therefore a capacity of approximately 40 lakh litres would be required. The major decision was as to how to store the water. Underground tanks are not viable for such a huge volume, though problems of algal growth would be taken care of. That left the option of surface storage. With such a large volume to be provided, the reservoir / lake had to be a major landscape feature on the site -- its design and construction detailing demanded an excellent aesthetic quality, besides structural soundness. A free flowing form was chosen based on the site layout and master plan.
The free flowing form demanded a flexible material for lining. The lining had to be almost perfectly impermeable to prevent ground water incursion, be resistant to ultra violet radiation and rodent attack, be non- toxic and be able to resist any differential hydrostatic pressure.
Mr.V.N.Gore of Geoscience Services, Mumbai was the structural consultant for the lake. Based on the soil investigation reports and detailed site studies, Mr.Gore recommended that the best option would be to use the in-situ clay itself as the basic lining material because of its impermeable nature in wet condition. The need therefore was to retain the moisture in the clay, for which it was recommended to give it a protection of jute-HDPE composite lining. With a coating of cement slurry on top, the fabric would be totally free from rodent attack too. Finally, for protection of the HDPE from ultraviolet radiation, random rubble pitching was recommended. In comparison to conventional lining like reinforced concrete, the recommended lining had the following definite advantages. |
| • |
The cost was only about 1/3 rd that of a conventional r.c.c lining. |
| • |
Being flexible materials (all the three – clay, jute-HDPE and random rubble), it gave tremendous design and construction flexibility. |
| • |
The construction required only semi-skilled/unskilled local labour and very little of mechanical equipment and tools. |
|
The depth was fixed at 2 – 2.5 metres on an average since this was what the ground substratum allowed and deeper storage may give rise to anaerobic conditions i.e oxygen starvation. The corresponding area was fixed at 2500 square metres. This area would harvest rainfall directly and also runoff from the roofs. The surface run off could also be collected after ascertaining its quality with on-situ testing.
|
Consumption and recharge profile of the Lake
Month |
Volume of water in lake at the beginning of month (in m³) |
Usage (in m³) per month |
Monthly
Evaporation rate (in ms) |
Evaporation loss in m³ |
Average monthly rain fall in ms |
Recharge volume m³ |
Net volume at the end of month
m³
|
Depth of water in lake |
Sept |
4456.45 |
780 |
0.075 |
183.60 |
0.286 |
1798.00 |
4456.45 |
2.35 |
Oct |
4456.45 |
780 |
0.125 |
306.00 |
0.368 |
2313.62 |
4456.45 |
2.35 |
Nov |
4456.45 |
780 |
0.125 |
306.00 |
0.204 |
1282.55 |
4456.45 |
2.35 |
Dec |
4456.45 |
780 |
0.125 |
306.00 |
0.042 |
264.05 |
3634.50 |
2.09 |
Jan |
3634.50 |
780 |
0.125 |
273.75 |
0.022 |
138.32 |
2719.07 |
1.80 |
Feb |
2719.07 |
780 |
0.250 |
523.60 |
0.020 |
125.74 |
1541.21 |
1.06 |
Mar |
NO USAGE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr |
1541.21 |
780 |
0.250 |
451.12 |
0.095 |
597.26 |
907.35 |
0.43 |
May |
907.35 |
780 |
0.250 |
427.23 |
0.241 |
1515.17 |
1215.29 |
0.87 |
Jun |
1215.29 |
780 |
0.075 |
129.16 |
0.698 |
4388.33 |
4456.45 |
2.35 |
Jul |
4456.45 |
780 |
0.075 |
157.58 |
0.611 |
3841.36 |
4456.45 |
2.35 |
Aug |
4456.45 |
780 |
0.075 |
183.60 |
0.393 |
2740.80 |
4456.45 |
2.35 |
|
Rainwater harvesting from roofs
Roof areas available for rainwater harvesting are provided with moulded aluminum gutters along the sides through which the water is channelised and let to vertical drainpipes provided.
These are connected to drain pipes laid along the site and the water is let to the lake after passing through a simple roughing filter.
An average section of 150mm x 125mm has been provided for the roof drain taking into consideration peak rainfall data.
Subsurface drains
Besides roof water, surface run-off from the site can also to be channelised to the lake for recharging it, after regular monitoring of its quality. The conventional storm water drains for surface drainage, besides being expensive; need recurring cleaning and maintenance for satisfactory performance.
To overcome this limitation, it was decided to opt for sub-surface drains. Subsurface drains, when properly designed and constructed need no maintenance and are also capable of draining the soil mass below ground in general. This would prevent water logging.
The sub-surface drains provided (as shown in the drawing) consists of a trench drain of 300mm x 300mm made by wrapping 20 mm crushed stone (coarse aggregate) in polypropylene fabric. A 50 mm PVC open jointed pipe is placed within the crushed stone to enhance the carrying capacity of the drain. The joints are protected by stainless steel weld mesh covered by polypropylene fabric tied by SS binding wire of 0.7 mm diameter. The drainage trench is excavated to 0.5-0.6 m below ground level. The portion above 300 mm height is widened up to 600 mm. A stepped excavation of the trench is adopted to facilitate placement of fabric.
After wrapping crushed stone with PP fabric, the top part of the trench is filled with coarse sand. The top surface is finished with a layer of rounded pebbles; where the drains cross roads, dry stone pitching is provided to facilitate vehicular movement.
All the surface run-off thus drained is collected in sump tanks at the west end of the site (which is the lowest portion), the water quality is monitored regularly and if within standards is pumped back to the lake.
The lake ecosystem
The lake has been developed as close to a natural ecosystem as is possible. There is very restricted activity in the lake. Passive recreation including selective use of pedal boats is being considered. A fountain has also been installed to help with aeration of the water.
Controlled aquaculture is being tried in the lake primarily to take care of the algae and possible mosquito breeding.
The fish chosen include columnar feeders like rohu, mrigal and cutla. Besides, ornamental fish like silver carp and coyi carp have also been introduced. The fish are fed with rice bran and groundnut cake once a day.
Fresh water mollusks are also to be introduced, as these are said to have properties to reduce turbidity of water.
Purification of water from the lake
The purification system for the harvested rain water consists of a simple coagulation and pre chlorination followed by settling, sand filtration, activated carbon filtration and post chlorination.
Treatment and disposal of sewage
The soil wastes (black water) are collected separately, led through septic tanks followed by anaerobic filters (upflow filters) and the treated effluent is let off to the back waters after chlorination.
Design of Sewage Treatment and disposal system |
| Sewage |
Left wing → S1→ pump chamber → S3 |
| |
Right wing and kitchen → S2 → pump chamber → anaerobic filter → back waters |
| |
Cottages → S3 → anaerobic filter → pump chamber → back waters |
|
Sullage Treatment and Recycling system
In order to optimise the usage of water, the grey water (sullage water from kitchens and bathrooms) is to be treated and reused for flushing, gardening and other non-potable end uses. Since there is open land available on the site, the main criteria for selection of the system for treatment and recycling of grey water were |
| • |
requirement of minimum maintenance, |
| • |
minimum dependence on mechanical systems, |
| • |
adaptability to varying loads, |
| • |
adaptability to varying climatic conditions (especially heavy rainfall), |
| • |
aesthetic appeal and above all |
| • |
possibility of recycling and safe reuse of water |
|
| Since any treatment system requires flow by gravity it was decided to pump the sullage to an elevated terrain and then let it flow down by gravity. For this an artificial mount has been created using the excavated soil got from excavation of the lake and sullage is pumped to the top of it.
Sullage (Grey water) recycling system
The sullage (grey water) is let through a multi stage low maintenance system to treat it and recycle it for flushing, gardening and other non potable end uses.
Sullage→Grease traps (for removal of fat and grease) → Anaerobic filters (for partial BOD removal)→ Submersible pump chamber →Constructed wetlands (for BOD reduction to 30 mg/l)→ Polishing pond (for BOD removal to 0 mg/l)→ online chlorination (for disinfection)→ Overhead tank for flushing /gardening
Quantity of water required for flushing/gardening etc : 8000 litres per day. (stage 1)
The waste water from the bathrooms, kitchen and wash areas of Cottages and Kitchen block is first led to grease traps for removing grease and fat. After the grease trap, the grey water is directed to upflow filters for removal of solid particles and also for partial BOD reduction due to anaerobic action The effluent from the filter is pumped to multi-stage constructed wetlands /reed beds at the top of the mount. The treated effluent is collected in a polishing pond, where the final polishing and BOD removal is effected mainly by water plants like duck weed. This water is chlorinated and pumped to the overhead tank for flushing, gardening and other non-potable end uses.
Details of Grease trap
The function of a grease trap is comparable to that of the septic tank; light matter will float and heavy matter will sink to the bottom. The difference is that the biodegradable solids will have no time to settle
So grease trap mainly removes grease and fat and also some heavier solid particles.
Details of Anaerobic Filter
The dominant principle of the septic tank is sedimentation in combination with sludge digestion. The anaerobic filter also known as fixed bed or fixed film reactor, is different in that it also includes the treatment of non-settleable and dissolved solids by bringing them in close contact with a surplus of active bacterial mass. This surplus together with “hungry” bacteria digests the dispersed or dissolved organic matter within short retention times. Most of the bacteria are immobile. They tend to fix themselves to solid particles, for, e.g. at the reactor walls. The filter media provides additional surface area for bacteria to settle. Thus, the fresh wastewater is forced to come into contact with active bacteria intensively. The larger the surface for bacterial growth, the quicker the digestion. Details of Horizontal Flow Reed Bed System
Constructed Wetlands /Reed Beds are designed man-made systems which are aimed at simulating the treatment that has been observed to take place when polluted water is let into naturally-occurring wetlands. These systems have been seen to purify water by removing organic matter (BOD) and oxidising ammonia, reducing nitrate and removing phosphorus. The mechanisms are extremely complex and involve bacterial oxidation, filtration, sedimentation and chemical precipitation.
A typical horizontal flow tank has a depth of about 0.6 m filled with gravel of 6mm to 12 mm size, with reeds growing on the surface. The wastewater, which is fed at the inlet flows slowly through the bed in a horizontal path until it reaches the outlet zone, where it is collected. During this passage, the wastewater will come in contact with a network of aerobic, anoxic and anaerobic zones. The wetland plants planted are predominantly phragmites australis, with some local species like typha and scirpus. The treated effluent is let through a polishing pond with duckweed and then after chlorination is collected and pumped to the OH tank for reuse for flushing, gardening etc.
Plumbing Lines
Sump tanks: A 10000 lt capacity sump tank is located near the main entrance which can store the available municipal supply water. There is an on-line chlorination after which the water is pumped to the OH tank.
The water from the lake is collected in the sump tanks near the pump room, after purification and from there pumped to OH tank.
The overhead tank above the kitchen block (OH1) has 2 compartments. The smaller compartment OH1b is to have treated and recycled grey water, which shall be connected to all flushing cisterns in the cottages and staff quarters in kitchen block and garden taps.
The larger compartment OH1a has the purified water from the lake and water available from municipal supply; this is to be supplied for all potable water taps, bathing, washing etc., in the kitchen, restaurant and cottages.
The water from the lake has been monitored regularly since June 1998, and based on the observations regarding various standards for drinking water, a simple purification plant has been installed. |
Performance of the system
The significant achievements in this Project could said to be |
| 1 |
It is probably the first of its kind to incorporate the concept of Total Water Management as one its strong concepts from the design stage. This had definite advantages that we could treat the system to blend with the landscape, make the most of the levels in the site (though Cochin is almost a floating city!) and provide for future expansions. |
| 2 |
It has helped prove to a city like Cochin, which cannot/does not have a centralized sewer network that DEWATS can be a definite answer for socially responsible projects to protect ground water. |
| The system has proved to be very stable over the last 4 years of its functioning and we have been monitoring the water quality (before and after treatment) regularly. However, we have had the following observations |
| 1 |
the inlet (untreated sullage) water has a very high fat and suspended solids content mainly from the restaurant – which requires very frequent maintenance of the grease traps and anaerobic filters. We have experimented various possibilities including use of biodegradable detergents, bacterial cultures for fat reduction, manual cleaning of oily vessels with paper/tissue before washing etc. Presently, we insist on weekly desludging of grease traps; however, disposal of the sludge is also a problem, especially during monsoons. |
| 2 |
The wetlands therefore struggle to cope with the heavy loads, which in turn slow down the growth of plants on the wetlands. Besides, there is often an anaerobic smell around the wetland. Since the hotel is on the windward side of the wetland, the hotel management sometimes find it awkward to deal with the foul smell. |
| 3 |
Hence, even though, we have been getting good results (as low as 40mg/l) after treatment, we have not been able to recycle the water consistently because of frequent maintenance required. W ater is a very scarce commodity on the site. Therefore waste water needs to be recycled for gardening and other secondary usage by which water bill can be reduced drastically. |
|
| In conclusion
The most significant achievements that one can understand from the above project could be that where good quality surface/ground water or piped water is not available, |
| 1 |
Properly planned decentralised water management systems can meet the total water requirements of projects of scale ranging from that of single residential units to whole building complexes, institutions, neighbourhoods etc, at affordable capital expense and negligible maintenance costs. |
| 2 |
In conditions similar to that of coastal Kerala, with a capital expense of just Rs.6000/- and land area of just 9 sq.m, one person's life long water requirement (at 100 litres per day of potable quality) can be met through rain water harvesting. In other words, covered storage of water is possible at a capital investment of just Rs.0.5 per litre. |
| 3 |
Domestic sewage and wastewater can be treated through simple low maintenance natural systems, enough for recycling for non-potable end uses, thus saving on almost 35 % of a person's daily water requirement. |
|
| |
| |
|